Which of the following describes good Army writing?

Good Army writing is characterized by being concise, organized, and to the point. This approach ensures that communication is clear and effective, which is essential in military contexts where time and accuracy are critical. Conciseness eliminates unnecessary words that could confuse or distract readers from the main message. An organized structure helps guide the reader through the information in a logical manner, making it easier to understand and retain.

Being to the point means focusing on the key information that needs to be conveyed, allowing for quick comprehension and action. This style aligns with the Army's emphasis on clarity and efficiency, particularly in scenarios where decisions must be made swiftly based on written communication. Effective Army writing facilitates accurate communication across various levels of command and helps maintain operational effectiveness.

In contrast, other writing styles such as wordy and detailed, complex and technical, or vague and indirect can hinder understanding. Wordiness can obscure the main ideas, while complexity may alienate readers who may not be familiar with technical jargon. Vague and indirect writing does not provide the clear direction that military personnel need to make timely and informed decisions. Thus, the focus on clarity and precision in Army writing emphasizes the importance of the chosen characteristics.