Which of the following is NOT a permissible action for the accused at an AR 32 investigation?

The action that is not permissible for the accused at an AR 32 investigation is appealing the decision on the spot. In the context of an AR 32 investigation, the process is designed to gather information and assess the facts before any formal action is taken. The accused is allowed to attend the hearing, present evidence, and cross-examine witnesses to ensure they have the opportunity to defend themselves and clarify any discrepancies.

However, the decision made during the investigation is preliminary, and the accused does not have the opportunity to appeal immediately. This is because the AR 32 investigation serves as a fact-finding inquiry rather than a forum for making final determinations of guilt or innocence. The opportunity to appeal typically arises after formal charges are brought and during subsequent legal proceedings, making on-the-spot appeals inconsistent with the established procedures governing the investigation process.