Which of the following is NOT a benefit of using active voice in writing?

Using active voice in writing offers numerous advantages that enhance clarity and engagement. One of the primary benefits is that it leads to clearer identification of the doer of the action. In active voice constructions, the subject is performing the action, making it immediately apparent who is responsible for what. This clarity can help prevent misunderstandings and keeps the reader engaged with more straightforward and dynamic sentences.

Additionally, active voice tends to result in shorter writing. This is because it often eliminates the need for extra words that passive constructions require, leading to a more concise expression of ideas. Another benefit is that the structure of active voice typically places the doer of the action before the verb, which can further enhance clarity and flow in the writing.

In contrast, the notion that using active voice contributes to a more formal tone is inaccurate. Often, active voice is associated with a more direct and vigorous style, which can actually lend a sense of informality or immediacy to writing. This characteristic makes the writing more approachable and engaging rather than formal and distant. Thus, suggesting that a more formal tone is a benefit of active voice does not align with the intrinsic qualities of active voice usage in writing.